keez.info
Secure deposits
and withdrawals All the balls are Someone You Tell Likes If How some sun The reason why this
Fast
Payouts Can watch how the Tell You How If Someone Likes may waiting for the new shooter game
Best Dating
Promise Games may end being Someone You Tell If How Likes playing games online can seen because reducing

Were the Germans "bad guys" in WW1?

Everyone was a bad guy, except America, Canada and ANZAC. ***rolls eyes*** Americans can do no wrong he? Well to be fair Woodraw Wilson supported Independence of colonial countries at the end of WW2. The British and the French refused that and continued occupying them. In a 6 person hot tub. It is a shame you have so many downvotes, as it is a good question. I suspect everyone reacting so badly might think you mean the "bad guys" n an absolute sense; that there is some kind of moral right and moral wrong which the warring powers fit neatly into. As /u/Warluster so articulately pointed out.

  • 1 While most contend that the Allied Powers were the "good guys," some believe otherwise, citing Russia's genocide against Jews during the war. Other critics point towards . The world isn't (always) black and white, and I don't necessarily think that there were good and bad guys in WWI. Reply With Quote. the problem is you're only allowing counterfactuals that assert with confidence what the nazis would do and assuming all else being equal; what if the nazis fought the soviet union and lost, but the western allies either hadn't joined the fight in any meaningful way or hadn't managed to make their way onto.
  • 2 You've probably got the efforts of the German Foreign Ministry's Schuldreferat (" Guilt Office") under the guiding hand of von Bülow, and the success of its interwar propaganda offensive, to blame for that. Years of anti-Versailles "revisionism" softened up many people -- who otherwise had no natural. While most contend that the Allied Powers were the "good guys," some believe otherwise, citing Russia's genocide against Jews during the war. Other critics point towards . The world isn't (always) black and white, and I don't necessarily think that there were good and bad guys in WWI. Reply With Quote.
  • 3 9 Jan BERLIN — A century after the start of World War I — the “just war” that was supposed to end all wars — the debate about its origins has become more textured and contentious, as much in once-imperial Berlin as in once-imperial Britain, which were adversaries in and are now confronting some of the. Everyone was a bad guy, except America, Canada and ANZAC. ***rolls eyes*** Americans can do no wrong he? Well to be fair Woodraw Wilson supported Independence of colonial countries at the end of WW2. The British and the French refused that and continued occupying them. In a 6 person hot tub.
  • 4 the problem is you're only allowing counterfactuals that assert with confidence what the nazis would do and assuming all else being equal; what if the nazis fought the soviet union and lost, but the western allies either hadn't joined the fight in any meaningful way or hadn't managed to make their way onto. 24 Dec Unlike in WW2 where we all know Hitler and friends are evil, I find the subject of WW1 up for discussion. Was it the Entente for taking an.
  • 5 3 Sep I think Germany was probably 60% the bad guy in WW I. A huge bit of the blame for what initially occurred goes back to the alliances that existed and the . I too find it a huge leap to go from "Germany started the naval arms race" to "Germany was in the wrong to fight WW1 and Britain and France were in. It's easy to argue that Hitler and the Axis powers should have been defeated in WW2 even though the Allies were not perfect either. Plus most of the countries fighting Hitler were mostly democratic nations. However I don't see how the Triple Entante or Germany were far worse during WW1. In a 6 person hot tub, there should.
  • 6 Since then, though, he has largely been portrayed as guilty of the charges that were levelled against him, as the century old propaganda continued to be . Unlike during WWII, where you could maybe say that Germany was the “bad” guy (seeing as Hitler committed such atrocities), WWI Germany did nothing like that. While most contend that the Allied Powers were the "good guys," some believe otherwise, citing Russia's genocide against Jews during the war. Other critics point towards . The world isn't (always) black and white, and I don't necessarily think that there were good and bad guys in WWI. Reply With Quote.
  • 7 It's easy to argue that Hitler and the Axis powers should have been defeated in WW2 even though the Allies were not perfect either. Plus most of the countries fighting Hitler were mostly democratic nations. However I don't see how the Triple Entante or Germany were far worse during WW1. In a 6 person hot tub, there should. 9 Jan BERLIN — A century after the start of World War I — the “just war” that was supposed to end all wars — the debate about its origins has become more textured and contentious, as much in once-imperial Berlin as in once-imperial Britain, which were adversaries in and are now confronting some of the.
  • 8 Everyone was a bad guy, except America, Canada and ANZAC. ***rolls eyes*** Americans can do no wrong he? Well to be fair Woodraw Wilson supported Independence of colonial countries at the end of WW2. The British and the French refused that and continued occupying them. In a 6 person hot tub. 9 Jan BERLIN — A century after the start of World War I — the “just war” that was supposed to end all wars — the debate about its origins has become more textured and contentious, as much in once-imperial Berlin as in once-imperial Britain, which were adversaries in and are now confronting some of the.

Site Navigation

It is a shame you have so many downvotes, as it is a good question. I suspect everyone reacting so badly might think you mean the "bad guys" n an absolute sense; that there is some kind of moral right and moral wrong which the warring powers fit neatly into. As /u/Warluster so articulately pointed out. It's easy to argue that Hitler and the Axis powers should have been defeated in WW2 even though the Allies were not perfect either. Plus most of the countries fighting Hitler were mostly democratic nations. However I don't see how the Triple Entante or Germany were far worse during WW1. In a 6 person hot tub, there should.

version

Goltirg Casino

Our Rating: 5.8 /10
  • Negative customer feedback
  • Questionable business practices
concealed details

Zoloran Bet

Our Rating: 2.7 /10
  • Slow to payout
  • Non-responsive customer service
dead

Tut Casino

Our Rating: 3.2 /10
  • Dodgy downloads
  • Severe lack of customer service

Site Search Navigation

This is a split board - You can return to the Split List for other boards. Log In Sign Up. Keep me logged in on this device Forgot your username or password? Don't have an account? Sign up for free! GameFAQs is on a new domainand we've updated our login system. Click here for help and information about it. Were the Germans "bad guys" in WW1? Topic Archived First Previous Page 1 2 3 4 5 6 of 6.

Sign Up for free or Log In if you already have an account to be able to post messages, change how messages are displayed, and view media in posts. In Britain, there was no parliamentary majority champing at the bit to give the Boche a biff on the nose.

Grey and Churchill, the hawks within the Cabinet, had to work hard to win backing for military intervention in support of France. Even after the British declaration of war and the creation of the War Council in London on August 5, there was still no decision yet as to whether or not Britain would actually send troops to France; the plunge wasn't finally taken until the following day.

None of this sounds terribly like a British keenness to fight. The war couldn't have come at a worse time for Serbia, which was still trying to panel-beat its armed forces into shape and hold down newly-annexed territories in Macedonia after two exhausting Balkan wars which had thrown a severe strain on its small economy. Maybe some of the hawks in the Black Hand were hoping to force a showdown with Vienna if they had Russia at their back, but the generally conciliatory Serbian response to the Austrian ultimatum looks more like an attempt to back down from war rather than to ratchet up the tension.

For the war's terrifyingly fast escalation from a third 20th-century Balkan conflict into a Europe-wide one, there's blame that can be shared around between Germany, Austria-Hungary, Russia, and France, with some powers deserving a bigger slice of the cake than others. But Who Were The Bad Guys In Ww1 don't believe that being unable to point the finger at only one of them means there were simply no bad guys either in the war's escalation or in its conduct.

Low expectations of whom? Not sure what you're saying there. The proximity of the village, coupled with a perceived general British Army acceptance and dismissal of petty crime by the local Arabs, meant that thefts and even murders took place regularly with little to no redress from the Imperial forces.

The Bedouin can't help being a thief and murderer, it's in his nature, his culture, etc. I realize it was beneficial for the Brits to ignore that kind of stuff in the midst of a campaign though. I've often thought to myself that the western democracies didn't really "rescue civilization from Nazism".

The USSR did the heavy lifting there; well, in destroying Nazism at any rate, not in rescuing civilization. Instead, what the western democracies actually accomplished -- despite what nem would Who Were The Bad Guys In Ww1 doubt say -- was to save half of Europe from communism. There was a double How To Show Her You Like Her imperative behind the intervention of the western democracies in the European war, even if they may not have seen it clearly for what it was until some years later, and that's why we shouldn't have just "stood aside and let Hitler get on with it".

As you've said, to believe that the biggest enemy of humanity was always and everywhere either Hitler or Stalin is to fall into the trap of a false dichotomy: Terms of Use Violations: Notes optional; required for "Other": Add user to Ignore List after reporting.

You are not allowed to request a sticky. More topics from this board Who Were The Bad Guys In Ww1 anyone like to collect "History"? Keep me logged in on this device. Forgot your username or password? Funkdamental Funkdamental Who Were The Bad Guys In Ww1 year ago 51 YINever posted Fair enough, although to belabour my point for what I promise will be the final time: But indeed, although I'm thinking primarily of circumstances under which the Nazis won, those other circumstances include a total Soviet victory.

All I've been arguing is that the Stalin whom Europe ended up with in was a lesser evil than the Hitler whom Europe would have ended up with in if German tanks had rolled through Moscow and ended the war there and then.

Funkdamental Funkdamental 1 year ago 53 haloiscoolisbak posted Al-Uzza Al-Uzza 1 year ago 55 Funkdamental posted If you could go back in time to witness one battle in real time, which?

A detailed comparison of the Han and Roman empires. NEVER give up the sudetenland.

Our reviewers show you the sites with:

  • The largest range of pokies and table Dating
  • The fastest payout times
 
 
 

Featured Guides

Who Were The Bad Guys In Ww1. Date Hookup!

was Germany the 'bad guys' in WW1?

You've probably got the efforts of the German Foreign Ministry's Schuldreferat (" Guilt Office") under the guiding hand of von Bülow, and the success of its interwar propaganda offensive, to blame for that. Years of anti-Versailles "revisionism" softened up many people -- who otherwise had no natural.

It is a shame you have so many downvotes, as it is a good question. I suspect everyone reacting so badly might think you mean the "bad guys" n an absolute sense; that there is some kind of moral right and moral wrong which the warring powers fit neatly into. As /u/Warluster so articulately pointed out. the problem is you're only allowing counterfactuals that assert with confidence what the nazis would do and assuming all else being equal; what if the nazis fought the soviet union and lost, but the western allies either hadn't joined the fight in any meaningful way or hadn't managed to make their way onto. You've probably got the efforts of the German Foreign Ministry's Schuldreferat (" Guilt Office") under the guiding hand of von Bülow, and the success of its interwar propaganda offensive, to blame for that. Years of anti-Versailles "revisionism" softened up many people -- who otherwise had no natural.